The Great Northern Transmission Routing Permit is now up at the Public Utilities Commission.
Just click on the link, and you’re there! Live!
New Commissioner Matt Schuerger does understand transmission, and has exposed their nonsense of this being a “reliability risk” issue. Will they care?
Libschultz: It’s a continuum, not a precipice?
And MP is hiding their theory under “Trade Secret” evidence that was withdrawn from the record.
Filed under Meetings, MISO, Routing Docket
Hot off the press — the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission will deliberate, and most likely decide, on the route for Minnesota Power’s Great Northern Transmission Line at its February 25, 2016 meeting:
Thursday, February 25, 2016, no earlier than 10:30 a.m.
Public Utilities Commission
Large Hearing Room, 3rd Floor
121 – 7th Place East, St. Paul, MN 55101
On the other hand, they might put the decision off until early March:
Notice issues — you may recall the notice issues raised at the public hearing — this is another one of those transmission dockets where additional routes were added and landowners on those new routes were not given notice:
Last Minute Notice to Landowners — NOT OK!
LATE NOTICE to Landowners, and Public Hearings Aug 12 & 13
From the ALJ’s Recommendation, the issues I’d raised — the lateness of the EIS was not made part of the Findings, the FEIS came out long after the Public Comment period closed, and even after the party briefs were due. How could anyone comment on the adequacy of the FEIS? Here’s the cut and paste from the ALJ’s report:
The issues raised should have been stated here, and not dismissed via referral to the Order Denying RRANT’s Motion… The contortions and contradictions of Commerce’s ongoing “explanations” should be a matter of public record, because it started out bizarre at the hearing, and over the next couple of weeks got even stranger:
| 20158-113450-01 | PUBLIC | 14-21 | TL | DOC-EERA | LETTER | 08/21/2015 |
| 20158-113402-01 | PUBLIC | 14-21 | TL | OAH | LETTER–CORRESPONDENCE TO MS. JENSEN | 08/20/2015 | |
| 20158-113405-01 | PUBLIC | 14-21 | TL | OAH | OTHER–CORRESPONDENCE | 08/20/2015 | |
| 20158-113397-01 | PUBLIC | 14-21 | TL | RESIDENTS AND RATEPAYERS AGAINST NOT-SO-GREAT-NORTHERN TRANSMISSION RRANT | REPLY BRIEF–RRANT REPLY LETTER BRIEF TO DOC-EERA | 08/19/2015 | |
| 20158-113390-01 | PUBLIC | 14-21 | TL | DOC-EERA | BRIEF | 08/19/2015 |
Oh, it’s my job to enter the Work Group report into the record? Methinks that’s the job of Commerce, why didn’t Commerce enter it into the record? Turns out it IS in the record:
| 201411-104621-06 | PUBLIC | 14-21 | TL | DOC EERA | OTHER–APPENDIX E – SUMMARY OF WORKING GROUP MEETINGS | 11/13/2014 |
The ALJ did look into these notice issues, and in the ALJ’s Findings, there was a lot more than “just” the notice issues I raised:
And the footnotes to the ALJ’s findings about Notice referenced in the above snippets show that the Applicant has not met the statutory notice requirements:
And generally, a few points of interest:
And in the Recommendation:
Charlotte Neigh’s complete Comments:
| 201511-115341-01 | PUBLIC | 14-21 | TL | PUC | PUBLIC COMMENT–PUBLIC COMMENT OUTSIDE OF OPEN COMMENT PERIOD | 11/02/2015 |
| 20159-113725-01 | PUBLIC | 14-21 | TL | PUC | PUBLIC COMMENT | 09/02/2015 |
Filed under PUC Filings, Routing Docket
