{"id":1073,"date":"2015-11-15T17:19:37","date_gmt":"2015-11-15T17:19:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/?p=1073"},"modified":"2015-11-15T17:43:18","modified_gmt":"2015-11-15T17:43:18","slug":"1073","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/?p=1073","title":{"rendered":"Concerns about hydro? Really, Fresh Energy?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"conawapa\"<\/a><\/p>\n

In today’s STrib, there’s a piece written by Ron Way about hydro power, with a familiar scenario presenting about how then Northern States Power did a deal with Sen. Gaylord Nelson to get its Allen S. King coal plant built<\/span><\/strong><\/a>, there’s a book there waiting to be written.\u00a0 But what’s disturbing is the commentary from Fresh Energy’s Micheal Noble with “concerns” about hydro.\u00a0 Concerns?\u00a0 And what exactly have you done about those concerns?\u00a0 I have no time for this “concern” first, because ME3, Fresh Energy’s prior identity, had an active hydro program, and that was disappeared, and second, that the Great Northern Transmission Project<\/strong><\/a> has been going on for more than three years and Fresh Energy was absent.<\/p>\n

Yet this OpEd today had this to say:<\/p>\n

\n

Such projects are still being built, and the social disorder they cause has a connection to the Twin Cities, because here\u2019s where the electricity is consumed. This is a very large concern of Michael Nobel at the nonprofit Fresh Energy in St. Paul.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Here\u2019s why:<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Manitoba Hydro of Winnipeg operates a giant system of hydropower dams and reservoirs on the Nelson River that flows north to Hudson Bay. A raging controversy concerns the Cree Nation, which is seeing its pastoral culture shredded and livelihoods shattered by sprawling reservoirs in that system.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Xcel Energy has a long-term power-supply contract with Manitoba Hydro. So in a very real sense, the electricity used here is contributing directly to Cree suffering.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

What especially worries Nobel is that Manitoba Hydro plans to aggressively expand its network of dams and reservoirs, further devastating the Cree. Some suspect that Xcel will seek much of the future supply from Manitoba as its aging baseload plants in Minnesota are retired within the next 20 years.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Assessing whether hydropower can be classed with solar and wind as \u201cclean and green renewable energy\u201d is, Nobel said, complicated at bes<\/em>t.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Overland’s comment about that “concern” about hydro:<\/p>\n

This is nothing new.\u00a0 Of course Xcel will get more power from Manitoba Hydro now.\u00a0 So will Minnesota Power.\u00a0 IF anyone is so concerned about the new dam going up in Manitoba, why is it that that NO ONE intervened in MP’s hydro transmission case, where Minnesota Power and Manitoba Hydro are building the largest capacity transmission project (500 kV triple bundled) in Minnesota in decades (it matches the Forbes-Chisago line).\u00a0 The Certificate of Need is long done (PUC Docket 12-1163).\u00a0 That routing docket (14-21) is also now complete, waiting only for the judge’s recommendation and Public Utilities Commission decision.\u00a0 Not one funded group intervened, Fresh Energy was no where to be seen.\u00a0 Without transmission, that hydro power wouldn’t be coming into Minnesota.\u00a0 No that they’ll have that transmission line built, it’s going to be marketed and imported, nothing will stop it.\u00a0 Fresh Energy’s hydro program disappeared about the same time ME3 did.\u00a0 This concern about Xcel’s increased use of hydro is more than three years too late — the largest transmission line in Minnesota is about to be routed.\u00a0 “Concern” doesn’t cut it.\u00a0 You have to show up.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

What are some Fresh Energy’s concerns that play out in its spending?<\/p>\n

$460k for being the RE-AMP Media Center<\/p>\n

$67k for being the RE-AMP Host<\/p>\n

$159,915 to Michael Noble (salary & benefits)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

RE-AMP was a major promoter of coal gasification back in 2005 when Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Project was getting going (as a result of the 2003 Prairie Island nuclear deal).\u00a0 Then RE-AMP became a major promoter of transmission.\u00a0 Good choices, folks…<\/p>\n

And $159k is just too much to be paid in a “non-profit” because to sustain that level of pay, well, it takes a lot of hustling.\u00a0 We see what advocacy activities are taken on, and what advocacy activities are avoided.\u00a0 The “mission” of Fresh Energy is to “Shape and drive realistic, visionary policies that benefit all,” but I’ve seen advocacy of policies that presume the public interest but in fact work against it — coal gasification and transmission are two that come to mind.<\/p>\n

Oh, and now Jeff Broberg is on the board!!!\u00a0 Remember his antics for Oronoco Twp. on the CapX 2020 Hampton – La Crosse transmission line?\u00a0 There’s Oronoco Twp\u2019s Exhibit 89<\/a> and Oronoco Township \u2013 Testimony of Broberg and Exhibits<\/a> – see Exhibit 7!\u00a0 And Oronoco squeals about \u201cnew testimony?!?\u201d<\/a>\u00a0 Someone of his claimed experience should know better…\u00a0 His spot on the Board of Fresh Energy makes me wonder what they’ll do next!<\/p>\n

And hydro?\u00a0 Fresh Energy used to have a hydro program specifically about the dams about Manitoba.\u00a0 What happened to it?\u00a0 Here’s the ME3 Hydro<\/span><\/a><\/strong> page back when they had a real website.<\/p>\n

From Ron Way in today’s STrib, the full piece:<\/p>\n

\n

Is hydropower green? Not really<\/a><\/h3>\n
\u2018Nothing alters a river as totally as a dam.\u2019\u00a0<\/a><\/div>\n

Harnessing energy from flowing water has helped advance societies since the days of the Roman Empire. \u201cHydropower\u201d launched the Industrial Revolution, shaped modern Europe and fueled an emerging America.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Hydropower\u2019s attractions surged in the mid-19th century, when dams were first fitted with turbines to produce electricity, setting off a building frenzy that filled American rivers and streams with thousands of dams.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Water energy at St. Anthony Falls made early Minneapolis a thriving center for mills to saw timber floated in from northern forests, and later to grind wheat into flour, making the city\u2019s milling district world-famous.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

It all makes sense. Hydropower\u2019s fuel \u2014 water, moved by gravity \u2014 just keeps rolling along. No need for an expensive mine or long coal hauls. Amid present-day worries over climate change, emission-free hydroelectricity is seen by some as \u201cclean, green and renewable\u201d \u2014 unlike gas-fired and especially coal-fired plants that spew greenhouse gases by the millions of tons.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/a><\/div>\n
The actual generation of power by hydro is undeniably clean, so its preferability over plants burning dirty coal is a no-brainer.<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n

But is hydropower, in the larger sense, \u201cgreen\u201d?<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Far from it, as more and more are coming to realize.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Hydropower relies on dams that impound water and create vertical pressure to spin turbines. Dams and reservoirs have profound environmental effects that are coming under intense scrutiny, with one prominent national group, American Rivers, pushing hard \u2014 and successfully \u2014 for dam removal.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cNothing alters a river as totally as a dam,\u201d writes author and river advocate Patrick McCully.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n

Minnesota native Denny Caneff at the Wisconsin River Alliance in Madison adds that the relatively small amount of power generated from hydro is \u201cdisproportionate [to] the environmental harm that it causes.\u201d<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

A dam, in essence, is a curtain of concrete that severs a river. The reservoir it creates is wholly unlike the river it replaces, and the change is certainly not for the better.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

University of Minnesota biosystems researcher Chris Lenhert\u2019s recent report for the McKnight Foundation on effects of the Ford Dam reads like a rap sheet on how the dam\u2019s reservoir has radically altered the Mississippi Gorge through Minneapolis.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cThe dam submerged one of the Mississippi\u2019s largest high-gradient, boulder-and-cobble streambeds and almost entirely blocked upstream movement of fish and mussels,\u201d Lenhert said, adding that many mid-channel islands in the Gorge were destroyed \u2014 and, with them, prime eagle habitat.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

The idea was to promote barge navigation, a plan that went bust. Some now say the dam, which annually costs taxpayers more than $1 million to maintain, should go. The only remaining commerce at the Ford Dam is a privately owned hydro plant that produces a piddling amount of electricity (less than a tenth of a percent of all power generated in the state).<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n

Caneff said the downside effects listed in Lenhert\u2019s report apply to most every dam.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Here\u2019s how:<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

As they impound water, dam reservoirs slow a river\u2019s flow. Its sediment load is dropped, creating a silted bottom that chokes out aquatic vegetation. Reservoirs trap toxics like PCBs and heavy metals along with nutrients that grow algae in water that\u2019s warmer than the river it covered up.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Dams are mostly built at river constrictions where gradients and rocky bottoms create riffles and rapids that oxygenate and clean the water. Gravel in pooled eddies is ideal fish spawning habitat.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Impermeable dams block fish movement, so species in the pool are far fewer than in the larger river. Mussels and clams, whose filtering is a vital for water quality, disappear, as they have in the Mississippi Gorge.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n

All of these effects are present at nearby River Falls, Wis., where critics have stalled the city\u2019s application to relicense its two power dams on the Kinnickinnic River.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Friends of the Kinni and a local chapter of Trout Unlimited cite another casualty of the dams: The falls that is River Falls\u2019 namesake has been submerged under the languid reservoir. That\u2019s similar to Ford Dam\u2019s reservoir, which covered a 5-mile stretch of world-class rapids through the Mississippi Gorge. Removing the dams would restore free-flowing rivers and natural features.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

It\u2019s the same at Taylors Falls, Minn., and neighboring St. Croix Falls, Wis. Both were named for a falls that\u2019s under the reservoir of Xcel Energy\u2019s hydroelectric dam, which flooded one of the most scenic and environmentally valuable places on the entire St. Croix.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

It was the St. Croix, by the way, that was central in a curious tale of intrigue about replacing hydropower with coal. You see, it\u2019s usually the other way around.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

In the 1950s, Xcel\u2019s predecessor, Northern States Power Co. (NSP), was pivoting from hydro to coal and nuclear baseload generators. NSP had gone through a bruising battle over its St. Croix Falls hydro plant and wanted to avoid a similar public maelstrom over another hydro project planned for farther up the river. This one would flood a huge area all the way to Danbury, Wis.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n

NSP was eyeing a large coal-fired plant at Stillwater, but an upstart politician, Gaylord Nelson of nearby Clear Lake, Wis., wouldn\u2019t hear of it. Nelson, who later served two terms as Wisconsin\u2019s governor and three terms as a U.S. senator, was also eyeing the St. Croix. But his vision was some kind of set-aside protection. He didn\u2019t want a tall, carbon-spewing stack piercing the St. Croix\u2019s skyline.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

NSP dispatched emissaries to a remote cabin near Mellen, Wis., with a deal: Nelson would drop his objection to the coal plant, and NSP would donate 30,000 acres it owned for the planned second reservoir on the St. Croix.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Nelson \u201ccut a deal with the devil and accepted,\u201d said one who attended the meeting. The Allen S. King Plant today still sends smoke up its very tall stack at Stillwater, and a legacy achievement of the late Sen. Nelson is a St. Croix that\u2019s a federally protected Wild and Scenic River.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Another downside to hydropower is the social disruption of the reservoirs.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Near Hayward, Wis., the 15,300-acre Chippewa Flowage, renowned for trophy muskies, was built in 1925 to stabilize flow on the Chippewa River for downstream hydropower plants. The project proceeded over strong but futile objections of the Lac Courte Oreilles band of Chippewa, whose lands were flooded.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n

Construction in 1933 of the massive dams and reservoirs of the Tennessee Valley Authority meant relocating 15,000 families and destruction of whole towns.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

North Dakota\u2019s Garrison Dam displaced Mandan and other bands on the Fort Berthold Reservation and South Dakota\u2019s Oahe took thousands of prime farmland acres from the Cheyenne. All the tribes strongly opposed the projects and refused to sell land, but it didn\u2019t matter because the builders had eminent domain on their side.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Same for the colossal Columbia River hydro projects \u2014 some 125 hydro plants in all \u2014 in the Pacific Northwest that displaced scores of American Indian tribes in four states. Worse, operating the system profoundly altered a salmon-based Indian culture whose history spans 3,500 years.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Such projects are still being built, and the social disorder they cause has a connection to the Twin Cities, because here\u2019s where the electricity is consumed. This is a very large concern of Michael Nobel at the nonprofit Fresh Energy in St. Paul.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Here\u2019s why:<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/div>\n

Manitoba Hydro of Winnipeg operates a giant system of hydropower dams and reservoirs on the Nelson River that flows north to Hudson Bay. A raging controversy concerns the Cree Nation, which is seeing its pastoral culture shredded and livelihoods shattered by sprawling reservoirs in that system.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Xcel Energy has a long-term power-supply contract with Manitoba Hydro. So in a very real sense, the electricity used here is contributing directly to Cree suffering.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

What especially worries Nobel is that Manitoba Hydro plans to aggressively expand its network of dams and reservoirs, further devastating the Cree. Some suspect that Xcel will seek much of the future supply from Manitoba as its aging baseload plants in Minnesota are retired within the next 20 years.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Assessing whether hydropower can be classed with solar and wind as \u201cclean and green renewable energy\u201d is, Nobel said, complicated at best.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

Ron Way is a former official with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the U.S. Department of the Interior. He lives in Edina.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In today’s STrib, there’s a piece written by Ron Way about hydro power, with a familiar scenario presenting about how then Northern States Power did a deal with Sen. Gaylord Nelson to get its Allen S. King coal plant built, … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35,27,24,11,37,28],"tags":[157,159,58,158,154,156,9,73,95,18,155,153,17,7,160],"class_list":["post-1073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-canada-permitting","category-certificate-of-need","category-condemnation","category-media","category-presidential-permit","category-routing-docket","tag-allen-s-king-coal-plant","tag-bribery","tag-carol-a-overland","tag-deals","tag-fresn-energy","tag-gaylord-nelson","tag-great-northern-transmission-line","tag-hydro-generation","tag-legalectric","tag-manitoba-hydro","tag-me3","tag-michael-noble","tag-minnesota-power","tag-not-so-great-northern-transmission-line","tag-st-croix"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1073","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1073"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1073\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1085,"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1073\/revisions\/1085"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/not-so-great-northern-transmission-line.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}